http://artmarketingsecrets.com/2009/06/twitter-for-business-real-or-not.html Art Marketing Secrets To Turn Your Artist Website into a 21st Century Art Marketing Machine Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:31:18 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 http://artmarketingsecrets.com/2009/06/twitter-for-business-real-or-not.html/comment-page-1#comment-356 mutuelle Sun, 01 Nov 2009 20:57:43 +0000 http://70.32.73.65/2009/06/twitter-for-business-real-or-not.html#comment-356 I think this is a real thing. I think this is a real thing.

]]> http://artmarketingsecrets.com/2009/06/twitter-for-business-real-or-not.html/comment-page-1#comment-197 mutuelle Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:52:58 +0000 http://70.32.73.65/2009/06/twitter-for-business-real-or-not.html#comment-197 I’m interesting to learn more about twitter opportunities I’m interesting to learn more about twitter opportunities

]]> http://artmarketingsecrets.com/2009/06/twitter-for-business-real-or-not.html/comment-page-1#comment-46 mutuelle Sat, 27 Jun 2009 13:11:57 +0000 http://70.32.73.65/2009/06/twitter-for-business-real-or-not.html#comment-46 I'm interesting to learn more about twitter opportunities,but no more time, I hope I'll stay in contact with the resources you provided here, thank you so much,for this . I’m interesting to learn more about twitter opportunities,but no more time, I hope I’ll stay in contact with the resources you provided here, thank you so much,for this .

]]> http://artmarketingsecrets.com/2009/06/twitter-for-business-real-or-not.html/comment-page-1#comment-45 Daniel Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:29:31 +0000 http://70.32.73.65/2009/06/twitter-for-business-real-or-not.html#comment-45 Susan - you can listen to the audio of the seminar at <a href="http://is.gd/14wL7" rel="nofollow">http://is.gd/14wL7</a> That will give you some ideas. My recollection - Fuji had a bland and hard to recognize logo, their bio was unclear or non-existent, and they had made very little effort to post. The Kodak site they referred to was associated with a specific corporate exec at kodak so it had a logo and his photo - much more personalized. The bio was interesting and clear and there was an engaging series of relevant posts. Hope this helps! Susan – you can listen to the audio of the seminar at http://is.gd/14wL7 That will give you some ideas. My recollection – Fuji had a bland and hard to recognize logo, their bio was unclear or non-existent, and they had made very little effort to post. The Kodak site they referred to was associated with a specific corporate exec at kodak so it had a logo and his photo – much more personalized. The bio was interesting and clear and there was an engaging series of relevant posts. Hope this helps!

]]> http://artmarketingsecrets.com/2009/06/twitter-for-business-real-or-not.html/comment-page-1#comment-44 Susan Elcox Wed, 17 Jun 2009 17:52:58 +0000 http://70.32.73.65/2009/06/twitter-for-business-real-or-not.html#comment-44 Can you share why Kodak and Fuji were good and bad examples? What are they doing that is different, and can you give examples of what a typical post would look like in a good and bad Twitterer? Can you share why Kodak and Fuji were good and bad examples? What are they doing that is different, and can you give examples of what a typical post would look like in a good and bad Twitterer?

]]>